- A development brief for online platform [here](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1YRHikbOnj0WLbVhc2BELcTUBk30rFFGOpYzF1ra7Jp4/edit?usp=sharing)
- 25 recipes to start your own sample archive [see recipes]()
- template for tactility videos of material samples [tutorial here](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXJnjBsCdBxGIRjgl9SVeoAYn7UzqS8A6)
- a [list of tools]() needed to start your own material samples archive
1) (WHAT) The project: title and phrase that describes it (vision/mission)
...
...
@@ -125,24 +133,7 @@ The recipes in the archive are accessible to anyone with a device that has a bro
Anyone dedicated to biofabricating materials and some experience in at least one of the processes can submit a recipe manually. If the recipe is thoroughly researched, the person can join as a contributor and get a log-in account.
##How?
- Prototype/mock-up for an online platform to host a digital material archive
- Offer selection of 25 recipes for biofabrication for a material archive starter that teach you the foundational techniques
- A physical material archive for my university's lab :)
- Future: get funding to build it (working on that)
##What we can look at so far! (23 March)
-[mock-up of online platform](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1YRHikbOnj0WLbVhc2BELcTUBk30rFFGOpYzF1ra7Jp4/edit?usp=sharing)
- 25 documented material samples [(example here)](https://class.textile-academy.org/2020/loes.bogers/files/recipes/biofoam/)
-[videos of material samples](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXJnjBsCdBxGIRjgl9SVeoAYn7UzqS8A6)
- pictures of material samples [(example here)](https://class.textile-academy.org/2020/loes.bogers/files/recipes/biofoam/)
###Archive starter
###Recipes to start a physical archive
| Nr | Title | Approx. Price | Image | Link |
...
...
@@ -262,108 +253,3 @@ Anyone dedicated to biofabricating materials and some experience in at least one
- section for open-source tooling
## Typologies
Made vs raw....Not very specific. Also raw seems like it's just there. Nothing is ever just there. Made could be:
- extracted
- cooked
- grown
- knotted, tied or woven
- modified (chemically)
- chemically connected or combined (e.g. glued)
- mechanically connected or combined
- eroded
- encapsulated
- pressed or flattened
Alternatives:
- ingredient vs. result
- ingredient vs. outcome
- ingredient vs. semi-product/material vs. processed "bewerking"
- singular vs. processed
- singular vs. connected through processes and techniques
None of them really work! Is something ever really singular? Is something EVER really from scratch? Maybe ingredient > material is the better so far.
- matter vs. material
- substance vs. material
- matter vs. culture ;-P hehehe
**Or maybe fivefold:**
1. matter (the substance)
1. techne (the craft, "thick")
1. technik (the abstract rules, "hard").
1. doxa
1. episteme
Where techne is being able to do it well to be able realise it and technik might be seen as the hard science behind it (the chemistry for example). And doxa could be the denominator for how we normally relate to it, related to its functions (like we'd call something biosilicone but it's not silicone, or kombucha leather, but it's strictly speaking not "leather" but it helps us understand each other in common terms.
And episteme, or understanding would be the holistic understanding of all of those, including culturally/historically/politically.
<p><ahref="https://vimeo.com/10048961">Sound Waves</a> from <ahref="https://vimeo.com/radarboy">George Gally (Radarboy)</a> on <ahref="https://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
by <ahref="https://sketchfab.com/francisbitontistudio?utm_medium=embed&utm_source=website&utm_campaign=share-popup"target="_blank"style="font-weight: bold; color: #1CAAD9;">Francis Bitonti Studio</a>
on <ahref="https://sketchfab.com?utm_medium=embed&utm_source=website&utm_campaign=share-popup"target="_blank"style="font-weight: bold; color: #1CAAD9;">Sketchfab</a>