diff --git a/docs/assignments/week11.md b/docs/assignments/week11.md
index 44e7f7544ed10396452aa7f2ba3d68550791bfe5..7c9a28486a9d117a6aa66cc60a8da1227167a2dc 100644
--- a/docs/assignments/week11.md
+++ b/docs/assignments/week11.md
@@ -9,32 +9,6 @@
 <iframe src="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/e/2PACX-1vSkdPoDWi5P-JfrYTUDtJelboAx5EKclvjIxfGMPSLR_QhpJwobThQY6XcrvoG9nlWe-opwY5jTLvgZ/embed?start=false&loop=false&delayms=15000" frameborder="0" width="960" height="749" allowfullscreen="true" mozallowfullscreen="true" webkitallowfullscreen="true"></iframe>
 
 
-
-##
-
-
-
->No archive is entirely stable or fixed (Dekker 2017: 12)
-
-What
-
-Why
-
-Archives are not neutral but have loaded histories and embody power imbalances still at work today. The seemingly simple categories and oppositions have a long history of being used to demarcate levels of civilization in the context of colonialism. Structuralist anthropologist Claude Levy-Strauss's *The Raw and The Cooked* for example (1964) described classifications as a device for understanding the cultures of others – categories such as the raw and the cooked have been clues to the core organizing principles for colonial Western understandings of "primitive" culture (Bowker & Star 1995: 3), as he discussed in his seminal study of Amerindian mythologies.
-
-
-
-
-Who
-
-When
-
-How 
-
-
-
-
-
 ## References
 
 Bowker, G. and Star, S. L., *Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences*, Cambridge/London, MIT Press: 2000 (1999).