parent e46e2799
Pipeline #112064 passed with stage
in 36 seconds
......@@ -112,9 +112,41 @@ In the following flow diagram you can see the steps and steps to be taken to obt
<img class="centrado" src="Fotos/Week19/3.JPG" alt="">
<center><p> With this information, I consider that it is convenient to patent as a utility model, since in front of the copy
detected, the patent holder may initiate administrative or legal actions to stop the
infringement and punish the offender, reducing the losses associated with this fact.</p></center>
<h1 class="my-4" align>
<small> UPDATE</small>
With this information, I believe that my project complies with the requirements of the utility model patent, but I have a limited time to publish on this web page, because the novelty requirement implies that I have never published, commercialized or disclosed any way, then I have a grace period of one year, that is, I would have until July 2020 to be able to present the patent application, the technical advantage requirement would fulfill it because although there are products with the same purpose, the mechanism that I use is different, integrating electronics, 3D printing, bluetooth communication, is what would differentiate my project from existing ones.<br><br>
But I've thought about it well, and the idea of my project is that people can clean more gaps anywhere in the world, being able to replicate, improve, make it bigger, etc. So the patent would prevent one of the most important objectives of the project, likewise wanted to share information on intellectual property in my country.<br><br>
Then I would opt for an initiative that is consistent with the objectives of my project, open source licenses<br><br>
<img class="centrado" src="Fotos/Week19/4.JPG" alt="">
Here are the most popular licenses<br>
<img class="centrado" src="Fotos/Week19/licencias.png" alt="">
Of all these, the one that seemed most appropriate to my project is the MIT license, you can find information about the other licenses <a href=""> following this link</a><br>
In the case of MIT license, permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files, to deal without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and permission shall be included in all copies, the information is provided without any type of guarantee or option to claim.
I found a guide on how to apply for an open source license
<img class="centrado" src="Fotos/Week19/5.JPG" alt="">
In conclusion, although the project could meet the requirements of a utility model in my country, this would go against the main objective of the project, so I prefer to license it as open source (MIT license), so that can be replicated, improved, anywhere in the world.
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment